Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Ellmaker

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1890No. 12068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action of unlawful detainer.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant, on August 11, 1880, took and hired from plaintiff’s grantor the premises described in the complaint, at the monthly rental of one dollar a month, payable in advance. Defendant admitted that she had signed the lease set out in the complaint, but denied that she took or hired the property thereunder, or at all, from plaintiff, and alleged that while in possession on said August 11, 1880, she was induced by plaintiff’s grantor to sign the alleged lease by false and fraudulent representations. She also alleged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. De Peralta v. GinochioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knowles v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Williams v. WaitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Williams v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Chovin v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Hoffman v. Wilderness Medical Society Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API