Legal Opinion

Abernethy v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 10, 2012No. 07-651LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*185RCFC 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501; class action tolling under Bright v. United States; RCFC 56 motion for summary judgment; laches; defense prejudice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VICTOR J. WOLSKI, Judge

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (“Mot. to Dismiss”). The government argues that the statute of limitations should not have been tolled for plaintiffs, putative members of a class whose certification was denied when the limitations period had more than two…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. InSpace 21 LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Thomas H. Askins, Jr. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API