Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2000No. 2000-0500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 321.] TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. KRAMER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer,

2000-Ohio-163.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension with entire year stayed on condition—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Failing to maintain complete records of all funds, securities, and other properties of a client coming into lawyer’s possession and render appropriate account to client—Failing to promptly pay or deliver to client, when requested, funds, securities, or other properties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. EisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. BoychukOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. BoychukOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FolwellOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API