Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Boychuk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 1996-2808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 93.] CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. BOYCHUK. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Boychuk,

1997-Ohio-403.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension—Misappropriation of client funds and neglect of client interests. (No. 96-2808—Submitted March 19, 1997—Decided June 25, 1997.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-34. __________________ {¶ 1} On April 15, 1996, the relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, filed a sixteen-count complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. BoychukOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ShamanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. BoychukOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API