Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 96-2808PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We have said on many occasions that the misappropriation of client funds and the neglect of client interests normally warrant the severe sanction of disbarment. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 164, 167, 672 N.E.2d 633, 635, and cases cited therein. However, in imposing a sanction, we consider not only the duty violated, but also the lawyer’s mental state, the actual injury caused, and whether mitigating factors exist. In this case, we note respondent’s personal and emotional problems that existed at the time of these infractions and the steps respondent has since taken to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. ShamanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. BoychukOhio Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API