Haas v. Buick Motor Division of General Motors Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crow
This is a suit upon a written express warranty brought hy the plaintiff, Clarence Haas, against the defendant, Buick Motor Division of the General Motors Corporation. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant and judgment was entered accordingly. The plaintiff filed a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative in arrest of judgment, or in the alternative, for a new trial, which motion was denied. This appeal by the plaintiff followed.
The plaintiff cites three alleged errors relied upon as grounds for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Rotche v. Buick Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Denny v. Goldblatt Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Hasek v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Larson v. ThomashowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Collum v. Fred Tuch BuickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Hedge v. Midwest Contractors Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.