Legal Opinion
Joseph v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 2016No. ED 103047PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge
Introduction
Glenn Joseph (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to realistically advise him. of the strength of the State’s case against him and the probability he would be convicted after á trial, causing him to reject a plea offer from the State: We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The State charged Mováñt 'as a prior and persistent offender with one count of burglary in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CEBRON CORDELL FINLEY, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Terry T. Watson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Terry T. Watson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016