Wallace v. State

Dissenting Opinion.

Martin and Gemmill, JJ.

The appellant is admittedly guilty of possessing, in violation of the law, a still or distilling apparatus and of using the same for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor.

The record shows that he had for his place of business a bakery at 1430 Broad street in the city of Newcastle, Indiana, and that his working hours were from a little after midnight until eight or nine a. mi He had bakery equipment on the ground! floor and a very elaborate distilling outfit in the basement, used for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor. The still…