Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Burford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1806PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

7 U.S. 448 (____)

3 Cranch 448

EX PARTE BURFORD

Supreme Court of United States.

Hiort, for the petitioner

MARSHALL, Ch. J.

There is some obscurity in the act of congress, and some doubts were entertained by the court as to the construction of the constitution. The court, however, in favour of liberty, was willing to grant the habeas corpus. But the case of the United States v. Hamilton, 3 Dal. 17, is decisive. It was there determined that this court could grant a habeas corpus; therefore, let the writ issue, returnable immediately, together with a certiorari, as prayed.

Upon the return of the habeas…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API