State Ex Rel. Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Original action in mandamus. We granted our alternative writ, after due consideration of the matter involved in the application for the writ. It is to-be regretted that just a little feeling appears in the briefs. The majority of this court hás strict en out short excerpts from a brief. All this, however, does not change the simple facts of the ease.
Eliminating from consideration the short excerpts stricken from one brief, by order of a majority of this court, we shall undertake a plain, concise and simple statement of the facts involved in the record now before US. ' ' írí| ¡^-!-|
The relator…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harding v. BedollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State ex rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Midwest Pipe & Supply Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.