Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Moesser

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1953No. Civ. 19621PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendant, predicated upon the granting of her motion for a directed verdict in an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on a stairway, plaintiffs appeal.

Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to appellants (Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co., 210 Cal. 108, 117 [9] [291 P. 184], the facts are these:

Defendant was the owner of an apartment house in which plaintiffs (husband and wife) rented an apartment which they occupied March 1, 1951. The apartment rented by plaintiffs was located on the second floor to the right…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McKellar v. PendergastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Chapman v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Rufo v. N. B. C. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Klein v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API