Legal Opinion

McKellar v. Pendergast

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1945No. Civ. 7070PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Appellant Sarah McKellar, by her action, sought to recover from respondents Pendergast, as owners, and respondent Randlett, as manager of an apartment house in the city of Sacramento, damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict in her favor. However, respondents’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted and judgment for defendants was entered accordingly.

By her complaint she alleged that at the time of the injury she was a tenant in defendants’ apartment house; that defen dants carelessly and negligently permitted an oily substance to remain on the lobby…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Touhy v. Owl Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API