Legal Opinion

Rick Franklin Corp. v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2006No. 98-10244CV; A121634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This case involves the responsibility of a primary and an excess insurer for the costs of environmental cleanup after gasoline from the insureds’ tanker truck spilled. The insureds are Lori and Robert Larkin, doing business as Larkin Transport (Larkin). The company that performed the environmental cleanup is Rick Franklin Corporation (RFC). The primary insurer for Larkin is Canal Insurance Company (Canal). The excess insurer is Acceptance Insurance Company (Acceptance). The trial court granted summary judgment to Canal on RFC’s claim against it and to Larkin on its claim against Acceptance.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Staley v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Severy v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Drury v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Barinaga v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  4. Bates v. Andaluz Waterbirth Ctr.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Main Street Development, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API