Legal Opinion

Severy v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1993No. CA A67293 (Control), A67001; SC S40232PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this case is whether, under the law in effect in 1984, the Board of Parole had the authority to “unsum” consecutive sentences for aggravated murder, i.e., treat the sentences as concurrent rather than consecutive, in setting a parole review date. The Board concluded that it did not have such authority, and the Court of Appeals agreed. Severy v. Board of Parole, 118 Or App 585, 848 P2d 1214 (1993). We also agree and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

In July 1985, petitioner was convicted of two counts of aggravated murder, ORS 163.095(1), 1 and one count of arson in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harris v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. O'MARA v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Severy v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Fleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Rick Franklin Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API