Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1901No. Nos. 12,516 — (41)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Anoka county to recover $25,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Giddings, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $5,000. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In an action to recover damages received by the plaintiff in a collision with one of the defendant’s trains, he obtained a verdict, and, defendant’s motion for a new trial being denied, an appeal has been taken to this court.

The collision was about ten .o’clock a. m., February 20, 1899, at a crossing of a street in the village of Osseo, just west of defendant’s station house. The plaintiff, with his wife, was riding in a top buggy, the top being down, driving a single horse. The street crosses the railway at an angle of about thirty-three degrees. The plaintiff was driving in a northwesterly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lammers v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Jenkins v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Greenwood v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Regali v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API