Legal Opinion

Regali v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1922No. 22,921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

According to the verdict of the jury, defendant’s negligence caused a collision between its train and plaintiff Regali’s truck, where the company’s tracks cross Twenty-first Avenue West, in the city of Duluth, which damaged the truck in the sum of $1,858.95. Regali carried insurance with the Employers Indemnity Company against loss from collision and the indemnity company paid him for a part of the loss sustained. The insurance company joined as plaintiff. The appeal is from the order denying defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.

Three grounds are assigned for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Brown v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Schneider v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. TrippCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. General Electric Co. v. Florida & Southern Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Sandberg v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API