Legal Opinion
McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 26, 1923No. 23,204PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after a directed verdict for defendants in a personal injury case.
The accident happened on grounds near Lake City where the *351Minnesota National Guard has an annual encampment. The railway company owns and operates double tracks through the grounds. Hagen is one of its locomotive engineers. At about 9 o’clock in the forenoon of June 1G, 1921, plaintiff droVe his auto truck upon a highway crossing over the railroad tracks in the camp grounds and was struck by the engine of a southbound passenger train operated by Hagen.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Marty v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Lewis v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Jenkins v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- In Re Psychopathic Personality of DittrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Haugan (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.