Legal Opinion

Harris v. Parris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963No. 241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The several defendants 'assign as error the -refusal of the court to -grant their motions for nonsuit. We may dismiss the Parris appeal by simply saying Mrs. Baras admitted she attempted to. turn left aaro-sis the three lanes for w-eSt-bound 'traffic, blocked1 the middle lane in which Whitley -approached1 the intersection without even- seeing the Chevrolet he was driving until the instant of impact. The court properly denied her motion for nonsuit.

Admittedly the defendant Whitley, operating the Annie Harris Chevrolet, -approached -and entered the intersection om the green- light. There is no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Hyder v. ASHEVILLE STORAGE BATTERY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Hudson v. PETROLEUM TRANSIT COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Bradham v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mobley v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Dolan Ex Rel. Dolan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Lonon v. TalbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. King v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API