Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Cutaia
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1989No. 13661PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This is an appeal from the granting of summary judgment and the award of interest in accordance with the terms of a series of promissory notes. The plaintiff, Billy C. Christensen, brought an action to collect the amount due on a series of promissory notes executed by the defendant, Anthony F. Cutaia. The notes contained acceleration clauses that, upon the defendant’s default, the plaintiff had exercised to declare all of the notes due and owing. After granting summary judgment, the trial court permitted reargument on the issue of damages and thereafter rendered judgment for the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Greenwich Contracting Co. v. Bonwit Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Kohlenberg v. American Plumbing Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Webster Bank v. OakleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. PlatzConnecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Bank of America, FSB v. HanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. John Fitch Court Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- B.P.G. Autoland Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.