Legal Opinion

Caban v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 23, 2009No. Case 08-60910-CIVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part J.P. Morgan Chase’s Motion to Compel Arbitration on an Individual Basis & Closing Case

ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge.

In this purported class-action lawsuit, Ms. Caban seeks to represent a class of credit card holders who were allegedly charged improperly inflated interest rates by J.P. Morgan Chase (“Chase”). 1 Now pending is Chase’s motion [D.E. 10] to compel Ms. Caban to arbitrate her claim on an individual — as opposed to class-wide — basis pursuant to the terms of the cardmember agreement. As explained below, although I find the class action…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krstic v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.(CORP.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  2. Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. McKenzie v. BettsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Starling v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API