Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2011No. 10 Civ. 3332(KMW)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
WOOD, District Judge:
I. Overview
Plaintiff Stephanie Sutherland (“Sutherland”) brings this collective and putative class action against her former employer, Defendant Ernst & Young LLP (“E & Y”), pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and Title 12 of the Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, 12 N.Y.C.R.R. § 142-2.2. E & Y allegedly violated the FLSA and the laws of New York by failing to properly compensate Sutherland, and others similarly situated, for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week. E & Y moves, pursuant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Ryan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.