McKenzie v. Betts
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, C.J.
The issue in this non-final appeal is whether the class action waiver in an arbitration agreement between McKenzie Check Advance and one of its customers violated public policy. The trial court found that the waiver went against public policy and denied McKenzie’s motion to compel arbitration. McKenzie appeals. The record below supports the trial court’s conclusion that consumers would not be able to obtain competent counsel in their actions against McKenzie for allegedly usurious rates on its payday loans if the claims could not be brought in a class action. Also, the waiver in this case…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cruz v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Baldwin v. Regions Financial Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Betts v. Fastfunding the Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- CFC of Delaware LLC v. SantaluciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.