Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hall, J.
In 1987, the plaintiff Mark Frankel (hereinafter the plaintiff) opened a credit card account with the defendant Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (hereinafter Citibank), subject to a written agreement which provided, among other things, that Citibank could unilaterally change any of the terms of the agreement at any time. About 14 years later, Citibank allegedly mailed the plaintiff a notice that it was changing the terms of the agreement by adding terms which provided that any dispute between the parties would be subject to mandatory, binding arbitration *283on an…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brown & Brown v. Theresa A. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Goldman v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fletcher v. Standard Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Brown & Brown, Inc. v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v. Van DykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.