Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,560 United States of America v. David B. Charnay
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge:
This appeal from an order dismissing the indictment presents the question of whether the indictment, alleging a market manipulation artificially depressing the market price of a security on a national securities exchange, was sufficient to charge the defendants-appellees with a conspiracy to violate, and the violation of, the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78ff, Rule 10-b promulgated thereunder, and the wire fraud…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. George Michael ShipseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.