Stone v. Drake
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; Joel D. Conway, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 13th day of July, 1901, the appellant, a citizen of Arkansas, commenced this action by filing before W. H. Rankin, a justice of the peace of Big Rock Township, Pulaski County, Arkansas, an account and bill of particulars, in the sum of $90.15, caused summons to issue for defendant, Walter Drake, which was returned on the 24th day of July, 1901, served, and on said 24th day of July, 1901,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; Joel D. Conway, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 13th day of July, 1901, the appellant, a citizen of Arkansas, commenced this action by filing before W. H. Rankin, a justice of the peace of Big Rock Township, Pulaski County, Arkansas, an account and bill of particulars, in the sum of $90.15, caused summons to issue for defendant, Walter Drake, which was returned on the 24th day of July, 1901, served, and on said 24th day of July, 1901, appellant recovered a judgment by default against said defendant in the sum of $90.15 and costs of the action, which…
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, J.,
(after stating the facts.) , The question presented by overruling the demurrer to the third paragraph of appellee’s answer is:
“Can appellant, a citizen of Arkansas, garnish the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, a foreign corporation of the State of Texas, that has a track and runs trains in Miller County, Arkansas, and has an agent there, for a debt due one of its employees for labor performed in the State of Texas, the employee being a citizen and resident of the State of Texas, and such wages by the laws of said State not being subject to garnishment?”
1. In Kansas City, Pittsburg &…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lancashire Insurance v. CorbettsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Harvey v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Howland v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. VanderbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Crockett Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- London Lancashire Ins. Co., Ltd. v. PayneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.