Legal Opinion

Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. Weber

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Biedzell, Oh. J.

This is an appeal from an order entered in the district court of Morton county, denying a motion of the defendant to dismiss garnishment proceedings. The plaintiff is a North Dakota corporation, the defendant a resident of Montana, and the garnishee a corporation doing business and authorized to do business in both North Dakota and Montana, but not organized under the laws of either state. The action is one to recover upon a promissory note and substituted service was obtained upon the defendant in Montana. Garnishment summons was served upon the Northern Pacific Railway…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Embree & Collins v. HannaNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DeerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Mahany v. KephartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Pepperell Manufacturing Co. v. Alabama National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. DickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Weitzel v. WeitzelArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. H. Williamson, Ltd. v. Phinney-Walker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API