Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 20 opinions

On error to the Camden Quarter Sessions.

1Per curiam

This judgment cannot be sustained. The record before the court exhibits all the errors that, more than forty years ago, led to the reversal of a judgment in the case of Cruser v. State, 3 Harr. 209.

The defects that vitiated the proceedings in that case, as indicated in the opinion, were that the indictment in question did not appear, from the caption, to have been one of the bills that had been found by the grand inquest; that the record did not show that the indictment was ordered by the Oyer and Terminer in which it was pending to be delivered to the Quarter Sessions; or that it was filed…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Henderson v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Mooney v. Buford & George Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Armour Fertilizer Works v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API