London Lancashire Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Payne
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, O. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is first contended that the decree should be reversed because the proof of loss was not filed within the time prescribed by the policy. The compliance with this provision of the policy was expressly waived by the local agent of the insurance company who issued the policy and delivered it to the insured. The local -agent had authority to- issue fire insurance, write and deliver policies, and collect premiums, and to notify the insurance company of loss. Having been clothed with these powers, he had prima facie authority to waive presentation of proof…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
- Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Crockett Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. KellumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- The Security Insurance Company v. Van NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Parsons v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Crockett Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.