In the Interest of: BFW, a Minor Child, DW and KW v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
[¶1] Appellants DW and KW challenge an adjudication which determined that they neglected their minor child. However, they have not adhered to the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure because they have failed to present cogent argument or pertinent authority to support their claims of error as to issues they raise. Accordingly, we summarily affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Appellants present several issues attempting to assert errors claimed to have been committed by the juvenile court. However, the issues are unintelligible at best, as they are uncoupled to any cogent argument or pertinent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Small v. Convenience Plus Partners, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Reece v. Wyoming State Board of Outfitters & Professional GuidesWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- In the Interest Of: Fp, Sp, Tp and Xp, Minor Children, Cp v. Emc Iii, Dc and the State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Byrnes v. HarperWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Latoya L. Adams F/K/A Latoya L. Gallegos v. Dominick A. GallegosWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- Daniel Charles Hemmer v. City of Casper Police Department; Officer Jacob Ondich; Officer Mathew Lougee; and Natrona County Detention CenterWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.