Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Oldham

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 16, 1992No. 1:91-cv-00158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HALL, District Judge.

CAME ON TO BE HEARD THIS DAY the following motions in the above entitled and numbered cause of action:. Motion for Summary Judgment of Tommy E. Harrell, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Harrison County, and Rick Berry, in his Official Capacity; Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence; and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants’ Objection to and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence. After consideration of the motions and the responses thereto, the Court finds the following: Motion for Summary Judgment of Tommy E.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. OldhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Compagnie Maritime Marfret v. San Juan Bay Pilots Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  3. Bruce v. EsperDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Holland v. O'BryantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API