In re the North Dakota Pipeline Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.*
Relator argues that conducting certificate of need proceedings for a large oil pipeline prior to the completion of an environmental impact statement violates the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). All parties agree that the pipeline is subject to environmental review under MEPA, but this review is set to occur during the routing permit proceedings after a certificate of need has been granted. Because the decision to grant a certificate of need for a large oil pipeline constitutes a major governmental action that has the potential to cause significant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.