Legal Opinion

Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2004No. 47A01-0310-CV-406PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Paul Wilfong (Wil-fong), appeals the trial court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of Appeliee-Defendant, The Cessna Corporation (Cessna Corporation), denying Wil-fong's Complaint of the existence of a prescriptive easement.

We reverse. 1

ISSUE

Wilfong raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the trial court erred by refusing to grant Wilfong a prescriptive easement because he failed to establish that the use of the property at issue was actual, hostile, open, notorious,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Bauer v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Jeffers v. ToschlogIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Brock v. B & M Moster Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Henning v. NeiszIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nodine v. McNerneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Lake County Trust Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API