Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Plaintiff, Paul Wilfong (Wil-fong), appeals the trial court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of Appeliee-Defendant, The Cessna Corporation (Cessna Corporation), denying Wil-fong's Complaint of the existence of a prescriptive easement.
We reverse. 1
ISSUE
Wilfong raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the trial court erred by refusing to grant Wilfong a prescriptive easement because he failed to establish that the use of the property at issue was actual, hostile, open, notorious,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bauer v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jeffers v. ToschlogIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Brock v. B & M Moster Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Henning v. NeiszIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Nodine v. McNerneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lake County Trust Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004