Legal Opinion
Bauer v. Harris
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1993No. 65A01-9208-CV-267PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
NAJAM, Judge.
James and Peggy Bauer ("Bauers") appeal a judgment in favor of their neighbors, Keith and Tammy Harris (Harrises), following a bench trial on the Bauers' claim of a prescriptive easement across a twelve-foot wide strip of the Harrises' property. The trial court found that the Bauers failed to establish their claim because their use was not exclusive, continuous or under a claim of right. We reverse and remand. 1
ISSUE
The Bauers present three issues for our review, but because of our resolution of this case, we address only the following issue: whether the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cox v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Umbreit v. Chester B. Stem, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. LewellenIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- North Snow Bay, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Scott-Reitz Ltd. v. Rein Warsaw AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.