Rajah v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:
This case presents us with the thorny task of reviewing a discretionary determination of the Immigration courts — whether or not to grant a continuance — a determination that must lie, as we have said, “within the range of permissible decisions.” Morgan v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 549, 552 (2d Cir.2006) (quoting Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc., 252 F.3d 163, 169 (2d Cir.2001)). We lack guidance from the BIA, however, as to the contours of this range, and although we have found certain decisions denying continuances clearly within the metes and bounds of permissibility, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mohammed Subhan v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Deu Thapa v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Rasaq Opyemi Sanusi v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ahmed v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rajah v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- L-A-B-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- RAJAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- Flores v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.