Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Stephenson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 17, 2002No. 01A848PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.

Applicants, North Carolina officials charged with administering t¿he State’s elections, seek a stay of a decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina invalidating North Carolina’s 2001 state legislative redistricting plan under the North Carolina Constitution. The application is denied.

The Supreme Court of North Carolina held that the 2001 plan violated what is known as the “whole county provision” of the North Carolina Constitution, which provides that “no *1302county shall be divided in the formation of a senate or representative district,” N. C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Clark v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lopez v. Monterey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Lockert v. CrowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kenyeres v. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. United States v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Perez v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
  5. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API