Legal Opinion

Otis Elevator Co. v. TODA CONSTRUCTION OF CA.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1994No. Docket Nos. H010706, H011117PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

After a court trial, appellant Otis Elevator Company (Otis) was ordered to indemnify respondent Toda Construction of California (Toda) for Toda’s payment of damages to a plaintiff who was injured in an elevator installed by Otis. On appeal (H010706), Otis contends that a contract requiring Otis to indemnify Toda was superseded by a later temporary agreement shifting the responsibility for all accidents to Toda. In a consolidated appeal (HOI 1117), Otis challenges the trial court’s award to Toda of attorney fees incurred in prosecuting the indemnity action. We will affirm the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. County of San Joaquin v. Stockton Swim ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Continental Heller v. AMTECH MECHANICAL SERV.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Jacobus v. Krambo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Torres v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. In Re New Power Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API