Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of San Joaquin v. Stockton Swim Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1974No. Civ. 13896PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, J.

Under statutes authorizing joint exercise of powers by public agencies (Gov. Code, §§ 6500-6514), the City of Stockton (City) Stockton Unified School District (School District) and County of San Joaquin (County) entered into a contract for the coordinated operation of public recreational facilities in the Stockton Metropolitan area. The contract provided for the establishment of an agency designated as Stockton Metropolitan Park and Recreation Commission (Commission) as the program’s operating agent. Commission consists of seven persons designated according to a procedure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. John E. Branagh & Sons v. WitcoskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Dewitt v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Societa Per Azioni De Navigazione Italia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Continental Heller v. AMTECH MECHANICAL SERV.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API