Legal Opinion

Radovsky v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This is an action to recover damages for negligent delay in transporting .a carload of figs from Fall River to Montreal. The figs were delivered to the New Haven railroad at Fall River, on January 24, 1920, and arrived at Framingham January 31, 1920; the shipment left Framingham on March 17, and the next day was delivered to the Boston and Maine Railroad at Lowell. Federal control of carriers ceased March 1, 1920. The car was in possession of the defendant from March 1, to March 18, 1920. Lowell is distant thirty-seven miles from Framingham. The shipment arrived at Montreal on March 29,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Burroughs v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Fox v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Nominsky v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Bernier v. Pittsfield Coal Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Nicholas Zeo, Inc. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hartley Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API