Bernier v. Pittsfield Coal Gas Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
In these actions, tried together, the plaintiffs are husband and wife; each suing to recover for injuries received from escaping gas, and the husband, in addition, is suing for expenses incurred because of his wife’s injuries. The harm suffered by the plaintiffs was caused by the inhalation of gas escaping from a break in the defendant’s pipe and percolating into the plaintiffs’ home from the street. It was stipulated that the pipe was laid three and one half feet below the surface; that at the time of the injuries the weather was extremely cold and the frost had penetrated into the ground…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Smith v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Carp v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- DeMarco v. PeaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Thompson v. Cambridge Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Goldman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Corthell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Black v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Bonfiglio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.