Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 29, 1976No. 7445PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

Action by an insured against his insurer for a declaratory judgment that the insurer is obliged to defend the insured and to pay any damages assessed against him in two pending actions. After a trial, Flynn, J., ruled in favor of the insured and reserved and transferred the insurer’s exceptions.

The plaintiff insured is a self-employed electrician. He wires outlets and fixtures and occasionally repairs electric appliances but his trade is primarily the performance of a service rather than the sale of merchandise. On November 6, 1972, the janitor of an apartment house called the plaintiff to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peerless Insurance v. CloughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  2. Magulas v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Sun Insurance v. HamanneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. LaChanceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Whitten Oil, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Hanover Insurance v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API