Legal Opinion
Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. LaChance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 29, 1975No. 7138PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
This is a petition for declaratory judgment to determine whether plaintiff’s homeowners policy issued to defendant Harry Nathanson requires plaintiff to furnish coverage to Nathanson for an accident that occurred in the course of his regular employment. All questions of law raised by a stipulation of facts and the insurance policy were reserved and transferred without ruling by the Trial Court (Loughlin, J.).
On November 15, 1973, defendant Harry Nathanson was employed as a stitching-room foreman at the Continental Shoe Corporation in Portsmouth and Lorna LaChance was employed as an embosser…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
- Gulf Insurance Company v. Ronald Tilley, Carol Jo Tilley, Marcella Smith (A Minor), Patricia A. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Dieckman v. MoranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MacDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hanover Insurance v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Storms v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Transamerica Insurance v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.