Legal Opinion
Peerless Insurance v. Clough
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 30, 1963No. 5106PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The over-all question here may be easily stated. It is the interpretation of an insurance policy which is for this court. Hogan v. Lebel, 95 N. H. 95, 97. However, between the Scylla of what the Trial Justice has termed the confusing, bewildering and misleading provisions of the policy, and the Charybdis of conflicting decisions, it is by no means easy to determine the answer. The specific issues are whether we should sustain the Court’s rulings that the defendant Clough had no coverage because of the exclusionary clauses relating to (1) *78property in the “care, custody or control of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kendrick v. MasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Nielson v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- John P. McNally and Tom McNally D/B/A McNally Elevator Service Company, Plaintiff's-Appellees v. American States Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Paul J. Mraz v. Canadian Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Bartholomew v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.