Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2004No. 2004-0387PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In a case before respondent Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, SBC Ohio sought to approximately double its rates for unbundled network elements (“UNEs”) provided to competitive carriers. In re Review of SBC Ohio’s TELRIC1 Costs for Unbundled Network Elements, case No. 02-1280-TP-UNC. On December 17, 2003, the commission set hearing procedures for the SBC Ohio case and denied SBC Ohio’s request for an increase in interim UNE rates. Id. In Review of SBC Ohio’s TELRIC Costs, at 6-7, the commission stated, “Although we are commencing a reexamination of certain TELRIC components as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Denton v. BedinghausOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Rogers v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hughes v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LoudenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Mason v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Brady v. PiankaOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Sponaugle v. Hein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Highlander v. RudduckOhio Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API