Legal Opinion
Venugopal v. Shire Laboratories
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 26, 2004No. CIV.A. AW-02-3534PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Meenakshi Venugopal (“Plaintiff’ or “Venugopal”) filed suit against Defendant Shire Laboratories (“Defendant” or “Shire”) alleging that Defendant’s failure to promote her was motivated by national origin animus in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Montgomery County Human Rights Law, Chapter 27 of the Montgomery County Code. Plaintiff also claimed that she was constructively discharged in violation of Title VII. Presently before this Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [28]. The motion…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tawwaab v. Virginia Linen Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Barreto v. SGT, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Bell v. University of Maryland College Park Campus Facilities ManagementDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Castillo v. Joann Urquhart, M.D., P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Chapman v. Maryland Department of State PoliceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.