Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Joann Urquhart, M.D., P.C.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 30, 2019No. 8:17-cv-01810Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NOHELIA M. CASTILLO, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. 8:17-cv-01810-PX JOANN URQUHART, M.D., P.C., et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 67) and Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ECF No. 70. The motions are fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background From August 2012…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API