Legal Opinion
Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 6, 1953No. 278Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
345 U.S. 128 (1953)
RAMSPECK ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL TRIAL EXAMINERS CONFERENCE ET AL.
No. 278.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 9, 12, 1953.
Decided March 9, 1953.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
Robert W. Ginnane argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Solicitor General Cummings.
Charles S. Rhyne argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Eugene J. Bradley.
Richard S. Doyle and Donald C. Beelar filed a brief for the Bar Association of the District of Columbia, Inc., as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.
2Opinion of the Court · MintonJustice Minton
Th…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Trial Examiners Conference v. RamspeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952