Legal Opinion
Federal Trial Examiners Conference v. Ramspeck
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 1952No. 5171-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Chief Judge.
This is an action against the Civil Service Commission and others brought by a group of hearing examiners appointed pursuant to section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1010. Plaintiffs seek to have declared invalid certain regulations pertaining to their appointment, promotion, tenure, and compensation. The case has been submitted on motions for summary judgment filed by both plaintiffs and defendants.
Section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act, referred to in this opinion as the act, provides in pertinent substance as follows :(a) Subject to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Democratic State Central Committee v. AndolsekDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- DEMOCRATIC ST. CENT. COM. FOR MONTGOMERY CO., MD. v. AndolsekDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.