Legal Opinion
Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 6, 1953No. 278PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Minton
The present suit was brought by the Federal Trial Examiners Conference,1 an unincorporated association of trial examiners, and by a number of individual trial examiners, against the members of the United States Civil Service Commission and the National Labor Relations Board. The plaintiffs, who had been appointed pursuant to § 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 244, 5 U. S. C. § 1010, sought a declaratory judgment that certain rules relating to their promotion, compensation, tenure, and the assignment of cases, promulgated by the Civil Service Commission pursuant to § 11, were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Trial Examiners Conference v. RamspeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
3Cited by64 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Luther D. Mullen v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Richard G. Shepherd v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Hazel M. SYKES, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.