Legal Opinion
Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 20, 1952No. 11421_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The urgency of a speedy determination of' this controversy is recognized by all parties concerned and accounts for the immediate hearing and consideration of the case by this court.
It is the conclusion of the majority that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. Their views are in substantial accord with those of Chief Judge Laws of the District Court set forth in his opinion, 104 F.Supp. 734.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Federal Trial Examiners Conference v. RamspeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952