BCAZ Corp. v. Helgoe

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant BCAZ Corporation appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its case from the inactive calendar pursuant to Rule V of the Uniform Rules of Practice of the Superior Court of Arizona.1 We hold that BCAZ complied with the requirements of Uniform Rule V and that the trial court therefore erred in dismissing its claim.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 This lawsuit arises out of BCAZ’s purchase of a chiropractic business from appellees Gordon Helgoe, his wife Denise Helgoe, and certain corporations. BCAZ filed a complaint against the Helgoes, Gordon Helgoe’s…